Quick Verdict — 10 Key Metrics
Green cells show the winner in each category. Deribit wins 4, Bybit wins 4, 2 ties. Neither is objectively better — the right choice depends entirely on what you're trading.
| Metric | Deribit | Bybit |
|---|---|---|
| My Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.7 / 5 |
| BTC/ETH Options Market Share | 90%+ | ~5% |
| Options Maker Fee | 0.03% | 0.02% |
| Options Taker Fee | 0.05% | 0.02% |
| Altcoin Options Pairs | None | 350+ |
| BTC Bid-Ask Spread (ATM) | ~$2 | ~$8 |
| Portfolio Margin | Yes | Yes (2025) |
| Min. Trade Size | ~$8K+ | $10 |
| Mobile App Quality | Good | Excellent |
| US Available | No | No |
| Get Started | Visit Deribit ↗ | Visit Bybit ↗ |
Fee Comparison
On paper, Bybit is cheaper. Its flat 0.02% maker and taker structure is simpler and lower than Deribit's 0.03% / 0.05%. On a $5,000 options trade as a taker, you pay $1.00 on Bybit vs $2.50 on Deribit. For 100 trades per month, that's $150/month in extra fees on Deribit.
But here's what the fee tables don't show: the bid-ask spread is also a cost. On Deribit, a BTC at-the-money call has a spread of ~$2. On Bybit, the same contract runs ~$8. For a round trip (entry + exit), that's $6 more in spread cost on Bybit vs Deribit. On orders above 5 BTC notional, Deribit's tighter spreads typically outweigh its higher quoted fees. For small retail positions under 1 BTC, Bybit is genuinely cheaper.
| Fee Type | Deribit | Bybit |
|---|---|---|
| Options Maker | 0.03% | 0.02% |
| Options Taker | 0.05% | 0.02% |
| Options Exercise | 0.015% | 0.02% |
| $5K trade (taker cost) | $2.50 | $1.00 |
Model your exact fee cost with the free fee calculator →
Liquidity and Spreads
This is where Deribit is untouchable. With 90%+ of global BTC options open interest, every professional market maker — Jane Street, Jump, Galaxy, DRW Cumberland — actively quotes on Deribit. The result is order book depth that simply doesn't exist anywhere else in crypto options.
I tracked live spreads on the same BTC contracts across both platforms over 14 days. The difference was stark: Deribit's ATM BTC call averaged a $2 bid-ask spread. The identical contract on Bybit averaged $8. For out-of-the-money contracts, the gap widened even more. On a round-trip trade, this means Bybit's effective trading cost is $6 higher per BTC contract before fees are even counted.
For altcoin options on Bybit, liquidity is much thinner — SOL options regularly show 5–15% bid-ask spreads on out-of-the-money strikes, which makes anything beyond simple directional buys impractical.
| Contract (approx) | Deribit Spread | Bybit Spread |
|---|---|---|
| BTC ATM call (1 BTC) | ~$2 | ~$8 |
| BTC 10% OTM call (1 BTC) | ~$5 | ~$25 |
| BTC 25% OTM call (1 BTC) | ~$15 | ~$80 |
| ETH ATM call (10 ETH) | ~$0.30 | ~$1.20 |
Spreads tracked over 14-day period, 9am–5pm UTC. Figures are approximate mid-market estimates.
Available Options Pairs
This is the most clear-cut category. Deribit supports BTC and ETH options only — full stop. Bybit supports 350+ options pairs across 40+ assets including SOL, BNB, DOGE, XRP, MATIC, AVAX, and more. If you want options on anything other than Bitcoin or Ethereum, Bybit is your only serious venue.
Bybit also wins on expiry variety for altcoins — weekly and monthly expiries are available on most major altcoin pairs. Deribit compensates with far more strike prices per expiry (150+ vs Bybit's 20–30 per expiry on BTC), making Deribit better for complex strikes-based strategies.
Deribit Options
BTC Options
Weekly · Bi-weekly · Monthly · Quarterly
ETH Options
Same expiry structure as BTC
150+ Strikes per expiry
Deep ITM to far OTM
12+ Active expiries
More than any other exchange
Bybit Options
350+ Pairs across 40+ assets
BTC, ETH, SOL, BNB, DOGE, XRP +
Weekly + Monthly Expiries
On most major altcoin pairs
20–30 Strikes per expiry
Less granular than Deribit
USDT-settled all pairs
No need to hold the underlying asset
Trading Tools
Deribit's tooling is purpose-built for professional options traders. Bybit's toolset prioritizes accessibility and speed. Completely different philosophies — neither is wrong, but one will suit your workflow better.
Position Builder
Multi-leg P&L + live Greeks before execution
Option Wizard
Strategy suggestions by directional view & IV
DVOL Index
Industry benchmark implied vol for BTC & ETH
IV Skew Charts
Full volatility surface and term structure
Options Chain
Clean chain view with decent Greeks display
Quick Order Entry
Fast single-leg options entry, best on mobile
Price Alerts
Good push notifications for position triggers
Copy Options
Follow other options traders (unique to Bybit)
Verdict: If you run multi-leg strategies (straddles, condors, butterflies), Deribit's Position Builder is essential — there's nothing comparable on Bybit. For simple directional buys and covered calls, Bybit's interface is faster and more intuitive.
Margin Systems
Both Deribit and Bybit now offer portfolio margin — but Deribit's implementation is significantly more mature. Deribit uses a SPAN-like algorithm that has been refined for 10 years and handles complex edge cases (large gamma risk at expiry, tail risk on multi-leg structures) more gracefully than Bybit's newer portfolio margin system (launched late 2025).
In practice, for standard strategies on Deribit — a short straddle with an OTM strangle as a hedge — portfolio margin saves 40–60% in required collateral vs isolated margin. On Bybit, standard strategies also benefit from portfolio margin, but I found occasional discrepancies in margin calculations on complex positions with 4+ legs that required manual adjustment.
For beginners and simple positions, Bybit's per-contract isolated margin is easy to understand — you know exactly what you're risking. For experienced traders running capital-efficient multi-leg books, Deribit's portfolio margin is the better tool.
Deribit
Portfolio Margin
SPAN-based, 40–60% capital savings, mature 10-yr system
Bybit
Portfolio + Isolated
Portfolio margin available 2025, still maturing. Isolated is simple and predictable.
Mobile Trading
Bybit wins the mobile category clearly. Its iOS and Android apps rate 4.8/5 in app stores and the options chain view on mobile is genuinely usable — you can see Greek values, place orders quickly, and manage multiple positions without fighting the interface. Push notifications for price levels work reliably.
Deribit's mobile app is functional but noticeably less polished. The options chain is cramped on smaller screens, the Position Builder is desktop-only entirely, and navigation between sections feels clunkier. For monitoring positions and simple orders, it works — but I wouldn't open a complex strategy from Deribit mobile.
Deribit Mobile
3.5/5
Functional but dated. Desktop preferred for all strategies.
Bybit Mobile
Winner4.8/5
Best-in-class crypto options mobile experience.
Who Should Use Deribit?
- You trade BTC or ETH options — Deribit has 90%+ market share and the deepest liquidity
- You size positions above 5 BTC notional — Deribit's spreads make it cheaper in practice
- You run multi-leg strategies — Position Builder is the only tool of its kind in crypto
- You want portfolio margin with a mature, battle-tested implementation
- You actively trade perpetuals and want the -0.01% maker rebate
- You prioritize institutional-grade security and Coinbase backing
Who Should Use Bybit?
- You want altcoin options — SOL, BNB, DOGE, XRP, and 40+ more. Deribit can't help here.
- You're starting with less than $5K — Bybit has no minimum contract size vs Deribit's ~$8K+
- You prefer mobile trading — Bybit's app is the best crypto options mobile experience
- You trade frequently with smaller sizes — flat 0.02% fee genuinely saves money
- You want USDT-settled contracts — no need to hold BTC/ETH as collateral first
- You're learning options and want a simpler interface to build confidence
FAQ — Deribit vs Bybit Options
The most common questions from traders choosing between Deribit and Bybit for options.
Related Guides
Affiliate Disclosure — RonOnCrypto earns commissions through affiliate links. This never affects our rankings. All testing was done with real capital on live accounts. See our review methodology and affiliate disclosure.